How It Works

The claim type nobody can argue with

The highest-cost claim type in workers' compensation is the one with no objective test in the file. This changes that.

Soft-tissue injury - the strained back, the sore neck, the sore shoulder - is the highest-volume workers' compensation claim type and the one traditional cost control cannot touch. It resists control for one reason: the entire claim rests on what the claimant says they feel. There is no objective test in the file, so there is nothing to argue with. The adjuster reserves for the worst case, the reserve drives the experience modifier, and the modifier prices the next three renewals.

This strategy replaces the subjective exam with data. Precision Motion Health - formerly Emerge Diagnostics, renamed in 2024 - runs an FDA-registered (Class II), patented electromyographic functional assessment (EFA). It measures involuntary muscle response rather than self-reported pain - muscle activity, range of motion and force, captured by wireless surface sensors rather than described in an exam room. The program around it is EFA-STM: a sealed pre-incident baseline, a matching assessment when an incident is reported, and a comparison that separates what happened at work from what the worker already had.

01

A pre-incident baseline, sealed

A pre-incident EFA captures the worker's true starting condition. The data is stored read-only and is never seen by the employer unless and until a claim is filed.

02

The comparison resolves the pre-existing-condition fight

Workers' compensation obliges an employer to return an injured employee to their pre-injury condition. The baseline establishes that condition in objective medical evidence, so only the work-related portion is accepted and treated.

03

Reporting gets more candid

When everyone knows function is on record, what gets reported is closer to what actually happened. The program reads as a culture of accountability, not an accusation - and a complete, candid incident log is worth more to a safety program than a short one.

04

The same data matters even when nothing is contested

Beyond claim defense, the assessment drives injury-risk screening, return-to-work decisions and better treatment targeting. Value does not depend on winning arguments.

The mechanism

A sealed baseline, then a comparison

Three steps. The whole argument turns on the fact that step one happens before any incident is reported.

1

Baseline

A pre-incident EFA captures the worker's true starting condition - back, neck and shoulder. Non-invasive, non-loading, under thirty minutes. The data is sealed and never viewed by the employer.

2

Post-incident

An incident is reported. A network physician licensed in the worker's own state runs a telemedicine visit with a virtual physical exam and authorizes the assessment, captured within 24 to 48 hours while the presentation is still fresh.

3

Change of condition

The two are compared to determine objectively whether - and by how much - function has changed against that worker's own baseline. Where a change is found, we issue site-specific treatment recommendations.

The assessment

What the assessment actually is

Wireless surface sensors are placed across the relevant muscle groups, and live EMG, range-of-motion and accelerometer data is captured for each side and each muscle through a guided set of movement intervals. It is a physiological record, not a subjective exam.

It is non-invasive and non-loading - the worker is not asked to lift or strain, so the test itself cannot injure them. One session captures five validated functional measures:

  • Surface EMG
  • Range of motion
  • Force / FCE
  • Grip strength
  • Pinch strength

The output supports a defensible claim decision and tells a treating clinician which region actually moved. The clinical benefit is the same measurement read for a different purpose.

Bilateral capture matters: each side is its own control, so an asymmetry is visible without reference to anyone else's normal.

Wireless surface EMG sensors in their charging cradle
The sensors. Sixteen wireless surface-EMG units in their charging cradle. There is no needle and no wired harness; the portable kit makes high-volume, on-site baselines practical.
Laptop displaying multiple live EMG channels
What the record looks like. One channel per muscle per side, captured live through a named movement interval. A post-incident capture is laid against the same worker's own baseline channels, and the comparison is either there or it is not.

Where it fits

The four patterns the comparison resolves

Three end in no measured change and one confirms a real injury. A program that only ever returned the first three would not be measuring anything.

Pre-existing condition

A prior condition and a questionable workplace event blur into one claim. The baseline separates them: if the pathology is on both tests, it was there before the incident.

Effort and consistency

Involuntary muscle response is far harder to direct than a pain report. The assessment shows whether effort across the requested tasks was full and consistent - a finding about the test, not a judgment about the person.

No physiological evidence of injury

The pattern we see most often after the first two: a reported symptom with no objective physiological finding behind it. Not a claim that nobody is hurt - a statement that the measurements do not show a change.

A real new injury, confirmed

The same data confirms genuine injury just as readily, and points care at the affected region on day one. A program that only ever returns one answer is not measuring anything.

Program objectives

What the program is built to deliver

  • Reduced OSHA incident rates
  • Fewer compensable soft-tissue injuries
  • Reduced experience modifiers
  • Reduced claim costs
  • Faster return to work
  • Better treatment solutions
  • Reduced Medicare exposure
  • Improved competitive positioning
  • Reduction of claims service fees

These are objectives, not guarantees. What any single account gets depends on its own exposure, reporting discipline and how the findings are acted on.

The wider program

The baseline is one component of seven

The model puts the client at the center of two orbits - one before a claim exists, one after it does.

Proactive - before any claim

  • Documented safety program
  • Actively manage culture
  • Management accountability
  • Baseline program
  • Incentive programs
  • Return-to-work policy
  • Hiring practices

The baseline program is one of seven elements; it does not replace the other six.

Proactive - after a claim is reported

  • Defense counsel
  • Occupational medicine provider
  • Soft-tissue management
  • Carrier culture
  • TPA / carrier adjuster
  • Internal adjuster
  • Nurse case management

Soft-tissue management is evidence for these people to use, not a substitute for them.

Transparency

Every step, visible in real time

A real-time client portal carries baseline completion by location and population, the status of every post-incident referral from request through determination, and volume, turnaround and outcome reporting on demand. HIPAA compliant, self-serve, no weekly file pulls.

This matters on a staffing or driver book. Baseline coverage is the number that decides whether the program works, it builds as people are hired, and it is invisible unless somebody is watching it by location.

Ask for a live walkthrough and ask specifically what the employer can and cannot see about an individual worker before a claim exists. The sealed-baseline protocol and the portal access model must agree.

Clinical leadership

Who stands behind the reading

The clinical work is led by Frank Tomecek, MD, a board-certified neurosurgeon and co-author of peer-reviewed EFA research, with a dedicated science team behind him. Analysis applies peer-reviewed, research-based analytics as pathological markers of myofascial injury.

Delivery is mapped to the client's footprint: mobile technicians on site where hiring volume supports it, and a growing clinic network for dispersed hiring.

Meet the leadership team
A worker completing a functional assessment with wireless sensors
We never claim a worker isn't hurt - only whether the findings changed from their own baseline.

That sentence is the whole discipline of the program. The baseline is taken before any incident is reported, and it is opened only when an incident is reported. If the post-incident assessment matches it, there is no measured change to compensate. If it does not, the change is documented, and care is aimed at the region that actually moved. The same test returns both answers, which is the only reason either one is worth anything.

Scroll to Top